Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
喜欢女主坚忍勇敢有行动力，双眼犀利，真有故事。末世生存要靠爱的信念和能力。
给人看完血压飙升会被气死…这动画确定不会给小孩们造成错误的引导方向吗？当中的虎墩真就是一个又任性又没有什么教养，无法无天目中无人的嘴强王者，干什么都是莽，给周围人带来麻烦，还会害死人，直到事情已经发生之后无法挽回才后悔，不过下一秒又开始各种作，这也还只是在动画片里面了，要是在现实中小孩模仿这样后果不堪设想…其次就是这个故事也挺糟糕的，作画也就那样没啥说的
穿冰鞋为国家突击，毁病毒为人类而战。冷酷绝境里的末日生存游戏，画面感强但剧情稍弱，劳拉的铁血女王人设加分不少。
主要是带小朋友看，形象还是挺可爱的，但是成年人就…可能是我更喜欢看有深度的
什么垃圾剧情 都是故弄玄虚莫名其妙 开始恐怖分子枪杀平民为啥不杀他俩？知道是病毒了为什么有女儿的女主还要坚持完成任务？知道女儿没了又想要毁灭病毒了？脑残编剧啊！
男主设计的太玄乎了
个人评价：
标准的好莱坞商业流水线电影，一眼就能望到头的剧情
为了纪念主角的英勇行径，国际奥组委将冰上追逐运动纳入了冬奥会，并命名为短道速滑。
有被情感线和氛围感深深打动到，表演和效果也完美呈现。至于背景交代不清就不必苛责了，这不正是瑞典电影的特色嘛。
纯粹由母爱串起的剧本，过于苍白了。女主角前后转变也太快了。另，病毒只靠一颗手榴弹就可以杀得死吗？
2.5星 拍的这么垃圾，试着回忆了一下，女主特别喜欢塑造这类角色，总是最后一个死，死得无可奈何，反正自己把棋走死了，爱咋咋地吧。
一般，太多bug了，母爱拯救世界也可以毁灭世界！
片子拍得不错了，场景很带感，冰海滑行的情节非常有创意，终于明白老美为什么要在世界各地建立生物实验室，原来是为了先发制人或是鱼死网破准备的。
「黑蟹行动含中字」https://www.aliyundrive.com/s/S9J4W3iqWst 点击链接保存，或者复制本段内容，打开「阿里云盘」APP ，无需下载极速在线查看，视频原画倍速播放。
瑞典&挪威⛷️宣传片？剧情没啥出彩的，冰上行动是唯一的亮点。但最后不要听指挥就是结束战争的方法有点那味儿了，这很白左？😂
有几幕印象深刻，溜冰作战确实没想到，是挺新颖的，就故事处理不是特别好。
确实是部烂片，剧情设定老套，其实就是讲了一个为了女儿而变成了一个毫无人性的母亲的故事。
个人感觉比这两年很多火爆的动画电影都要好！故事是很简单的故事，但是很完整没有瑕疵。人物真实又很可爱，虎墩和师傅的转变都有逻辑不生硬。看完的感受就是一个字：温暖。ᵎ(•̀㉨•́)و ̑̑
看到这主角形象。我就奇怪好眼熟，原来是周星驰，哈哈哈哈
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
