Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
通过对比就知道王千源塑造的角色是多么出彩了。
感觉比原版更跌宕起伏，各个角色演技也比原版更突出，不得不说韩国拍犯罪题材的确很成熟了。黄政民的演技还是很优秀的。以及李浩贞的胸虽然只出现了一幕也是很有存在感的。
我无法理解这个宇宙里竟然有人愿意翻拍丁晟老师的作品。更无法理解还拍得不如原版。
就是一部反派内部大乱斗！不过反派耶确实比黄政民的角色出彩
角色错位了，真正的黄政民不会自己脱身，能脱身的黄政民只是一个叫黄政民的角色。相较之下还是原版更好一点。
惊悚片为什么有枪了不击毙敌人，拿着枪逃走，神逻辑
一般，专程来看黄政民嘞，没想到剧情很一般感觉没咱们好看。
【3】————— 📀 2021·韩国
演王千源那个角色的小哥全程一个表情，这不行啊，特别是去自首的那场戏，咋回事啊怎么一点胸有成竹的表情都没有，难顶起来了
黄叔演技是真的牛，但片子也真的太单薄，实在是达不到4星。新世界的梗遍地开花，太搞笑了🤣朴叔这么喜欢说hey brother，干嘛不干脆叫李小小来客串😂
从原版的警方穷追不舍终破案到黄大神的独力自救其实是很合理的韩国本土化改编，唯一继承了原版的就是真实明星被绑架这个概念，然而黄政民所扮演的黄政民仍旧是一个架空的角色，所以自己演自己也就失去了实际的意义，再加上整个文本又陷入了绑匪内讧自残的闹剧窠臼，反派比起王千源差的又太远，所以尽管黄政民演的十分卖力，仍旧无法拯救全篇的平庸和无趣
黄政民肉搏，一向都很好看。
剧情故事一般，没有惊喜，剧情有点搞笑，人质活到最后居然是遇到一群内讧傻子团伙…
解救吾先生和夏洛是最近几年国内我最喜欢的电影。韩国这个版本吧，表现形式差了很大，千万别跟中国版本比较，韩国版本根本不配
写实题材，后面发展得过于传奇。何况还用了黄政民本名，更不好过于天马行空，《解救吾先生》里刘德华可不叫刘德华。韩国改我们的也改失败了，不容易啊。
我怀疑这部电影像韩剧一样边写边拍。绑匪登场的一瞬间就极度引起了我的心里生理不适，这一点还挺成功的，以为不会开倍速的我还是开了，唉
打斗戏手铐的桥段和老手如出一辙…
黄政民的演技确实没的说,对手戏的反派角色就有点过于刻意！相比解救吾先生还是觉得国产的更胜一筹！解救吾先生更多的展现了警察办案的快准狠！韩国 版就更多的赋予演员人物属性！
遇到找你合影的人，友善一点。如果你是个明星的话。另外，韩国警察啊，一如既往的窝囊。
写实题材，后面发展得过于传奇。何况还用了黄政民本名，更不好过于天马行空，《解救吾先生》里刘德华可不叫刘德华。韩国改我们的也改失败了，不容易啊。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
