剧情介绍

Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?                                    
                               The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)                                    
                               From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 殳俊健 9小时前 :

    在我眼里和迪家近两年的作品《黑寡妇》《十戒》也没差太多,至少档次比之《毒液》不要好太多。可能期待值拉到最低,特效和动作还不错?

  • 魏浩初 9小时前 :

    1. 出现台词比如:“there is no shame in what we are"; “Micheal doesn't accept what he is"; "you have to stop denying who you are";"just you and me"

  • 耿英韶 1小时前 :

  • 逢浩气 6小时前 :

    这两年索尼的超英也算是生不逢时了,和毒液项目一样摆烂

  • 鸿德 2小时前 :

    D— / 好于「毒液2」,就算再烂再敷衍去掉漫威油滑喜剧or麦麸套路也清爽很多,但凡吸血鬼的设定再帅or残暴点至少观感会好一点,杀人杀的也太匆忙毫无仪式感。

  • 褒绿凝 3小时前 :

    我以为的莱托少爷演吸血鬼:《夜访吸血鬼》中阿汤哥那样式的…

  • 茂思凡 3小时前 :

    咋的分这么低,多好看呐!可能我就漫威真爱粉?就喜欢这种每一步都猜得到剧情但直呼好帅的剧情!人脸蝙蝠脸无缝切换,好自然,毫无美图痕迹!在楼顶配合霓虹灯闪烁,美得不得了。终于get到了莱托少爷的颜值!期待后续!

  • 静妍 8小时前 :

    看这个时长就隐约觉得不妙,果然剧本稀烂,就这可别叫板蝙蝠侠了,还拉来迈克尔·基顿这昔日batman,漫威现在真是连简单的快乐都提供不了了,真是浪费了吸血+基情的题材,也就女主的颜值可以看看,另外莱托现在是怎样,专门致力于让大家在片中看不出来自己么。

  • 泣鸿宝 8小时前 :

    蝙蝠总在各种电影里被黑化,传播疾病是主体,没办法了。

  • 祁壹 6小时前 :

    流沙式的特效与慢动作让人眼前一亮。暗黑博士的双面性是本剧最大的戏剧点。开篇之战对角色身份进行了一个交代,期待后期的多元融合。

  • 池筠心 8小时前 :

    索尼这水准就别搞邪恶六人组了吧,比比谁更尬?

  • 韵芙 3小时前 :

    特效还不错,故事好俗套…少爷为了这个片子也是很辛苦,概念真的好像吸血鬼…

  • 梅采 5小时前 :

    太难看了,没有任何新意……浪费我人生两小时

  • 柏振 9小时前 :

    但是后半个小时属实崩得厉害,感情戏更是鸡肋到爆

  • 柏桃 9小时前 :

    19/5/2022 @ 海運。不算爛,但整個製作老土得以為時光倒流20年…..除了主角外其他角色都是工具人,故事也是完全猜到下一秒會發生甚麼。另外中段堅持不吸人血竟然令我想起況天佑😂

  • 革思聪 9小时前 :

    这才是纯血蝙蝠侠啊,比隔壁DC的蝙蝠侠老爷血统纯正多了。当然剧本老套、人物深度约等于无,打起架来有点像毒液。总体超预期,原以为是超级大烂片呢,其实不至于,甚至可以从头到尾看完。

  • 锦骞 5小时前 :

    故事情节太简单了吧~反派Milo真是毫无意义的存在。变身后的视觉效果还是到位了,不管是飞翔还是声波定位都挺好看的,女助理的颜也非常在线。不满的地方在于为什么把NYC刻画成了哥谭市。至于说片子太划水不深刻之类的评价,也感觉完全没必要,难道指望看一部吸血鬼版的达拉斯买家俱乐部吗?

  • 雀鸿哲 3小时前 :

    《毒液》大賣之後的偷懶之作,一樣正反派同源,一樣沒種拍R級,一樣惡意賣腐,區別只是前者爛而賣座,《莫比亞斯》爛而不賣座。故事幼稚出了喜劇效果,該著筆的部分都沒著筆,該解釋的部分不解釋,擺爛得那麼理直氣壯也是一種本事,理直氣壯地kidding me。最可氣的是,本該是看點的動作戲和驚悚戲,都稀碎,動作戲無聊透頂,甚至談不上有什麼動作設計,就是沒完沒了的殘影、重擊、慢鏡頭,驚悚戲少得可憐,而且還都是是最爛俗老套的橋段。

  • 苑忆彤 5小时前 :

    Jared Leto的自恋履历表又增加了一个角色,然而本片没有什么吸引人的地方,不是烂片但就是非常普通,看的人可以把后面的情节预测的一清二楚,而且我真的受够了“我不会动手”这一套,你搞出来的祸事你赶紧解决啊!

  • 雨阳 2小时前 :

    2022.6.6 22:04 震撼程度还是有少许缺失,毕竟是第一部,希望后面有更大的惊喜。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved