-
视频
视频
资讯
视频
资讯
Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
为了亲王和雷佳音。。。给个三星吧。。。如果不联想原著的话 本身的故事没有太大的bug 但是跟原著不能说毫无关系 只能说关系不大 现现还是挺帅的 葛优还是挺好笑的 不过搞得我还是想去再看一遍剧版了。。。
辛芷蕾那是幸子头吗？
勉强及格。导演层面来说，是郭子健目前最好发挥。整体把控比较扎实，对时代还原用心了（作为香港导演尤其难得），葛优承担了几处笑点，但演绎的比较低调，这个角色也是有层次感的（社会人的油滑和对老友的承诺），反派们整体智商都在线，咏梅翻脸就砸手，而全片最大亮点在造假村的头目阿如那，扮猪吃老虎的算计下面，有份夸耀自己酒量的草莽豪气，这种年轻匪首的角色，在中国电影里并不多见，没有参照物的情况下演到这个程度，我佩服。雷佳音的演技没有问题，但角色设定不对，他以一介底层酒蒙子修理工的身份，介入顶级鉴宝故事，虽然也是扮猪吃老虎，但他浑浑噩噩的状态是为了蒙谁？为了达到什么目的？李现则是表演问题了，双雄斗智的感觉没撑起来。相对全片气质，CG呈现的鉴宝过程略显浮躁，当然最浮躁的是后面的地宫夺宝，平民能有实力做出这地宫？
怎么最后连爸爸的死都不追究了，两小时就忘了初心
看了点映，基本满场，好多男生来看。主要讲鉴宝、寻宝。用电脑特效画面来讲解古董，通俗易懂，活灵活现。非常值得一看的电影。
就一下饭片。“开个会员周末线上看看还行，疫情期间跋山涉水去电影院肯定不干”的程度。
7，高于预期，觉得是马伯庸作品里商业化改编做得最好的，葛大爷戏感太强了，每句台词都是笑点。
这几个人像差着辈分，看起来像硬攒的局，就很好笑。
地摊文学：一个酒鬼带领美女打破偏见，冲破迷雾，最后一刻站在舞台上破解惊天阴谋，让众人仰视。剧情专供屌丝意淫。
雷佳音吃完那颗糖后会不会在回去的路上拉肚子啊？
1、故事、人物都很拉垮，局中局也比较容易识破，看到“阴在阳之内”就已经猜到了结局；2、硬凹一些很尬的cp笑点，李现造型合格但声音太出戏，幸好还有葛优拉回一点好感度。
李现辛芷蕾扑克脸演技，整了一堆大哥大姐过来客串。主线太弱了，不如夏雨版电视剧。话说回来，就是一个手机包膜的事，说这么费劲儿？
24/4/2022 @ 英皇時代。那陣濃烈中二味果然是熟悉的郭子健😂 在人物描寫如此不足時候(葛優死那段太尷尬了)，用一場又一場的推理/動作場面以快打慢也算是聰明的做法。之不過這結局…..其實主角爺爺也真的是漢奸啊😅
可能我对这类题材无感吧 感觉就那样 现在国产这种电影都要加几句某某某依法处置字幕么
镜头和节奏很乱，不懂导演故弄玄虚想做啥。
评分低了，至少7.5。表演剧情细节质感都在线
真的很一般，故事很燃很炸很煽情，看完不知道他讲了个啥，几个演员莫名其妙哭的点也很奇怪。
还得尝尝不知道过期多少年的大白兔奶糖，谨防食物中毒。
看过原著忘差不多了，懒得吐槽了，只觉得很多漏洞。许爸不怕把自己儿子给玩死中吗？文物特效很好看。
真的很一般，故事很燃很炸很煽情，看完不知道他讲了个啥，几个演员莫名其妙哭的点也很奇怪。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
