Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
没有新意 再看第二次就会有点厌倦 这一次的讽刺力度也小了一些
期待2022，还能什么更荒诞魔幻的事情不能在地球发生
然后就是里面提到的很多事我真的没啥印象，就仿佛不是生活在同个世界...
上一次看《2020去死》还感觉就在不久前...
算是一个头条快速复习吧…还是蛮好笑的哎……
你以为你在看Netflix，其实你在看暴走大事件
老三样：黑川普、婊保守派、吐槽网红，就这样吧，累了毁灭了。
啥也不敢说，幽默比较硬给，有几个笑点还可以是唯一的亮点
这是要做成系列了吗，如果能有中国版的death to 2021就更好了。
继承上一部death to 2020的风格，只有这种介于真真假假直接，荒诞的喜剧才能让人笑对又一操蛋的一年。
该去死的既不是时间也不是地球，而是根本不会吸取任何教训的辣鸡银累。
如果问人类从过去一年中学到了什么？很遗憾，问题的答案将和2020年一样：没人吸取到一点教训，我们什么都没学到——从《2020去死》到《2021去死》就能看出。影片拍得好，下次不许再拍了——这个系列可以“去死”了。
以纪录片的形式做的喜剧片，也就是说，是一部伪纪录片。人物采访、解说、主持人都是演员，穿插了大量的真实镜头，主题是对2021年的抱怨
2021现实就算是变成吐槽大会也很难笑起来
（ps：个人认为影片整体传达观点全面而客观，但其反讽演绎形式需要观众有独立思考，不易愤怒的基本素养）
算是一种仪式感吧，2021和2022看的第一部片子都是这个系列，不过如果有Death to 2022我应该不会再看了。
这部是网飞为了夹带私货自己两部剧吧…… 现在看这类题材，只恨Veep完结的太早，这两年让那老几位出来闹一闹得多精彩啊
当冲突能带来利益，既得利者们开始引导甚至制造冲突。
人设太有代表性了，这么看来让他们每年聊聊热点事件就能完成节目了，有料有趣却又无聊，请不要用这个系列代替黑镜圣诞篇… “纪念”每年被封S的明星那段倒是有创意。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
